FRAMES/GESTALTS/SCHEMATA which are reflected in my response to the long ordeal of homelessness

10.30.22pm7.56Sunday (Reformation Sunday)

In my present work, I am interested in determining fundamental, near-constitutional, FRAMES/GESTALTS/SCHEMATA which are reflected in my response to the long ordeal of homelessness-- in-re then unspoken reasons for eviction, but then too plausibly because I AM A SISSY AND 'DRESS THE PART.' I am NOT interested in a 'SCHEMA THERAPY' as much as I am in the very psychology that 'spitefully' made me act in DENIAL TO THE 'DEGRADATION CEREMONY' of forced exodus from a home-with-cat-re-which-I-was-rent-payer-and-community-charitable-figure. The usual and known work to alter after identification of 'schemata' seems to be a literature with some eclecticism, vagary, and use of 'psychometrics' which to my assessment may obscure THE BEING AS ADJUSTING TO THE HOMELESS CRISIS WHICH THIS FORCED EXILE (which always seemed to be of motives-suspect to me). I am using my writing, the versification, the prosaics, and the discomfiting 'screeds' which constitute/construct this Corpus of Words, 'preserved and for hypersensitivity voided'. This work, then, will endeavor to make an order of this tri-partate of attempted MEANING.

There is a certain 'tempo' associated with the 'produce' of my writings; vexing personal times will-- from a verbal primordium's riot of passion-- make me emit a volley of words, not quite unintelligible, but definitely in a 'manic form' close to 'flight-of-ideas'; the word is new to me, but to my assessment utterances of this variety are in form and content close to 'screeds'  such as one often finds in the 'mad manifestos' one may on occasion see in 'rant websites.' In my case, while being a 'recipient' of such addresses commonly provokes REJECTION RESPONSE (including for such rare times that I read my own 'screeds'), the content of this linguistic material is so close to 'raw psyche' that REALLY it behooves me, in a calmer moment when in fact the 'crazy document' is never/ever cilrculated, to regard this content as RAW MATERIAL, almost a direct expression of what severally in pschology and philosophy gets called 'psychic schemata.'

Too often, my screeds are so offensive to my turned-more-rational social-internalizations, and I OMIT them. The usual motive for such OMISSION/erasure (c.f. F.C. Bartletts, op. cit., infra) frequently is THAT THE CONTENT IS EMBARRASSING OR SENSITIVE-TO COMMUNITY CASTIGATION, but IFF instead of brash publication of such literary tripe, then REPRESSION/SUPPRESSION, I just 'put' what 'feels screedy' into a non-circulating file, apart utterly from 'the madding crowd,' and 'when I have stomach for it,' to little by little imbibe the text (and 'wince'!) I think I can get to the gist, whose emotional and crypto-rationalized power gives seminal awareness for a NEXT TYPE OF WHAT-- STILL IN THE SENSE GIVEN BY ROMAN JAKOBSON-- CONSTITUTES A 

POETICS-- MEANING=>

PROSE. In the terms given by F. C. Bartlett (REMEMBERING, 1932), my (or anybody elses's it would seem by implication) prose embodies effort to RATIONALIZE experience melded to thought, indeed amounts to-- as Bartlet says-- to RATIONALIZATION and as such betrays schemata of 'our' sort schema that reflects congruancy with OUR CULTURE's ASSUMPTIONS, BELIEFS, ATTITUDES, a psychic necessity I am taught by such teachers as Bartlett ( and Hermann Ebbinghaus, MEMORY-- English translation of Deutsch) as being essential for the economy of frame-setting in individuals, which of course is a framing that is cognate with making schemas.

In LINGUISTICS AND POETICS by Roman Jakobson, we are given direct thesis that PROSE is also of-POETICS; I concur, and make elaboration on this point to the effect that my 'prosaics' stand midway between screed and verse, which could imply a 'pyramid' of language (in at least my case) from raw-utterance through prose-rationalization, toward an apex with versification-- especially 'tied' with assonance and meter, as GESTALT, a kind of worded SPIRITUALITY in characteristic form a 'procedural' if not 'declarative' schematic for Juridic/binding-moral future and present action-response.

It seems congenial at this node of discussion to re-invoke F.C. Bartlett's book, cited here, above, for what readily could be elements of expression (in this case responsive to the before/during/after of Homelessness-mine) which need observance-- a rare sub-discipline for my own 'literary criticism' that might point the way toward finding dimensions of schema-influence in the overal task at-hand, the CONSEQUENCE of this designated three-fold of home1, unhome, home2. . .Other touchstones designating 'schematic shaping' in Bartlett involve TRANSFORMATIONs (terming narrative events in the flow of time in ways congenial to our 'cultured' understanding (this culturing may exactly be purely idiosyncratic, as is often in my case=> the terms for example that I would use to make words about 'eviction-mine,' would definitely NOT be those of the 2021May12 evictors, 'Sherfs' and 'hirelings' putting my stuff on the parking lot below my place, and sending me 'packing' not allowing my taking ID or my $1300 in cash for the purpose of street-survival. . . I know that Bartlett mentions a fourth, last, indication  of schema-presence-- disordering of events-- but at the moment I cannot recognize large violations of this type of threat to normative-narration. 

Bartlett and Jakobson provide the stimulus for this search for schemas/frames, and I fail if I do not mention in this regard to my present work, the INTRODUCTION-TO-METAPHISICS/LIMITATION-OF-BEING Chapter on 'uncovering the obvious phenomena' in the work of Martin Heidegger. . .